A free check ยท EU AI Act and California SB 942

Does the law reach your AI?

Eight questions at most, usually fewer. The answer names each obligation that reaches your system, the article that sets it and the date it binds. When nothing does, it says so.

How the answer is reached

Nothing here is decided on this page

The questions, the rules that fire, the findings and the duties are all read from one published decision model, signed with the same Ed25519 key as the rest of the regulatory record. The dates come from the obligation corpus and are put in tense against your own clock, so an obligation shows as in force the day it starts binding, without anyone editing a page.

One model, two readers

An AI system asking our MCP server the same question gets the same answer. The deploy refuses to publish if the two evaluators ever disagree, and that is checked across every one of the 6,561 possible sets of answers.

It can say no

Three of its outcomes conclude that nothing in the record binds you, and the California Act imposes nothing below one million monthly users. A check that only ever found obligations would be a sales funnel, and would make every other answer we give worth less.

What it does not decide

High-risk classification under Annex III or Annex I, sector regimes such as HIPAA, and whether a given disclosure is adequate. Those are assessments, not lookups, and the answer says so rather than guessing.