The next binding date
…days
Reading the register…
Constitutional governance · Est. MMXXVI
Machine-readable regulatory intelligence, signed so anyone can check it, and a public register any AI system may query without an account. Everything on this page is live, the moon included.
The next binding date
…days
Reading the register…
Integrity
Verifying…
Checking the published signature on this corpus.
Check any business
Free, unauthenticated, and the same answer an AI system gets.
Four things, plainly
Reading anything here is free and unauthenticated. A claim nobody can check is worth nothing, so checking must never cost anything.
Every obligation we track, with the instrument, the article that sets the date and a link to primary law. No tense is stored. It is computed at the moment you read it.
Which businesses have been verified, and which have not. It answers not_registered for almost everyone, and says plainly that this is not a mark against them.
Identity and domain verification reviewed by a named person who signs the decision. We do not certify ourselves, and the record says so.
The same record over the Model Context Protocol, with an Ed25519 signature on every document so a model can check its source rather than trust the transport.
How verification works
Every one of them is a step you can check afterwards. That is the only reason the process is worth publishing.
Something is asserted: about a business, a system, or an obligation in law.
The primary instrument is attached. The article that sets the date, not a summary of it.
A named person examines the evidence and signs the decision. There are no anonymous approvals and no automatic ones.
The result is signed with Ed25519, so any later edit to the document breaks the signature.
It is published where anyone can read it. No account, no key, no rate limit.
You, or any AI system, can recompute the same answer from the same sources and get the same result.
Do not take our word for it
Below is a live excerpt of the regulatory record: the exact bytes we publish, under the exact signature we issued. Change one character, a date, a comma, anything, and watch the check an AI system runs against it fail. Put it back and the seal closes.
01SHA-256 of the document, as it stands
Computed in your browser, on every keystroke.
02The digest Lunara signed
From the published assertion.
03The signature over that digest
Checking…
Reading the record
One moment.
Nothing here is simulated. The text is fetched from /corpus/obligations.json, the digest from /corpus/obligations.assertion.json and the key from /.well-known/keys.json. Your edits never leave this page. The same check, from a terminal, is on the signing page.
The record of being wrong
A compliance authority that has never issued a correction is either very lucky or not looking.
Five corrections are published against this institution, in full, with what we got wrong and why. One of them is an obligation we missed for three days, a prohibition that arrives on 2 December 2026 and carries the heaviest penalty in the Act.
Correction 04 · published against ourselves
Article 50(2) marking, for generative systems already on the market
2 February 20272 December 2026
The Digital Omnibus grants four months, not six. We had carried a date from an adjacent instrument, and a date carried is a date nobody can check. Every reader of that row was told February. It was December.
Read all five correctionsNothing is trusted merely because Lunara says it is. Check the record.

Shield certification
Identity and domain verification, reviewed by a named person who signs the decision, published where any AI system can read it without an account. Revocable, so the record stays true after the day it was written.
The moon on this page is lit from its phase at the moment you opened it, computed in your browser. Surface and relief: NASA’s Scientific Visualization Studio, CGI Moon Kit, from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter’s LROC colour mosaic (NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University) and LOLA elevation (NASA/GSFC). Public domain.