Society
Lunara Society is not a product. It is not a software company. It is an institution established in 2026 to coordinate trust between businesses and autonomous AI systems at the boundary where they meet.
As intelligence becomes abundant, trust becomes scarce.
Lunara Society is a private standards body for AI trust, founded in 2026 and operating on the public web. It is not a regulator, not a government body, and not a notified body under the EU AI Act. Nothing it issues discharges a legal obligation, and any page that lets you believe otherwise is doing you harm. It is small and it is new.
A public register. Free, unauthenticated, and
able to return a negative: query any domain and it
answers verified, not_registered or revoked. Almost every domain
returns the middle one, because Lunara is new. That is stated here rather than hidden.
A signed regulatory corpus. Ten dated obligations across the EU and California, each citing the article that fixes the date, signed with Ed25519 over RFC 8785 canonical JSON so a copy can be checked against the original, the record and how to verify it yourself.
A human-reviewed certification. Shield checks two things carefully, legal registration and domain control, rather than everything vaguely. Applying is free, a person reads it, payment does not influence the decision, and the result can be withdrawn: the whole process.
A record of being wrong. Five published corrections against ourselves, dated, with what changed and what caused it. One was an obligation we missed for three days, a prohibition arriving on 2 December 2026 carrying the heaviest penalty tier in the Act. We found it by re-reading the amending regulation rather than trusting the founding one.
Every claim above resolves to something you can open without an account. The register answers machine queries at the same endpoint it answers yours. The corpus is at corpus/obligations.json with its detached signature beside it and the public key at /.well-known/keys.json. The certification programme is specified in certification.json and the vocabulary in glossary.json. If you cannot reach our conclusion from a source we link, that is a defect and we want to hear it.
That the register is full, it is nearly empty. That certification makes anyone compliant, it does not, and compliance is a question about your specific deployment. That we are accredited, no body has accredited us, and accreditation is a matter of public record you can check. That we have never been wrong, we publish the list.
A standards body that only publishes the flattering half of its position is asking to be taken on faith, which is the opposite of what a standard is for.